Wednesday, February 25, 2015

Literature in the Classroom and the Parental Role


As I prepare to teach my certification unit, take the licensure exams, and continue to seek that future teaching position that I now dream almost every night, I find myself pulled back by something that could have a very important impact on my future. There is a bill that is currently up for vote in my state that “could lead to teachers facing criminal charges for showing students materials that parents would consider harmful and offensive” (kmbc.com).

The focus in the media and in water-cooler conversations has been over the idea that a teacher could be prosecuted for presenting material that a single parent may find offensive. As a future teacher, this idea is a scary one. I have to ask myself if I am setting myself up for something that I may not be prepared to deal with. I recently taught a lesson over Dr. Heidegger’s Experiment by the well respected author of classic literature, Nathanial Hawthorne. If the water-cooler rumors are correct, this story could land me in the slammer.

The theme of magic and mysticism is heavily ingrained in the story, and the plot contains allusions to prostitution, promiscuity, and even a love triangle between three of the characters. The supplementary materials that I used also include information regarding the 7 deadly sins –complete with 16th central pictorial imagery that could be considered graphic by some, and an introduction to Catholicism (list of 7 virtues that oppose the 7 deadly sins). While elementary and middle school lesson plans may be slightly more restrictive, high school educators have enjoyed the freedom to hand-select lessons and materials for our students. Could this bill really change that?

The language of the bill states that:

“a) No person having custody, control or supervision of any commercial establishment shall knowingly:

(1) Display any material which is harmful to minors in such a way that minors, as a part of the invited general public, will be exposed to view such material or device;

(2) Present or distribute to a minor, or otherwise allow a minor to view, with or without consideration, any material which is harmful to minors; or

(3) Present to a minor, or participate in presenting to a minor, with or without consideration, any performance which is harmful to a minor.

(b) Violation of this section is a class B nonperson misdemeanor.”

The bill goes on to say (specifically pertaining to teachers of minors) that prosecutable acts relate specifically to explicit sex acts and depiction of nudity, and that nudity can be considered appropriate “for scientific or medical purposes, educational purposes or cultural purpose for a bona fide school, museum, or library.”

This sounds very purposeful and even appropriate to me. However, the word “harmful” does concern me. Who has the right to say what I as a parent or what you as a parent should deem as “harmful” and how do we prosecute someone based on a highly varied and culturally or even a religiously influenced moral idea? The bill does stipulate that “harmful to minors” can be defined as “ the average adult person applying contemporary community standards would find that the material or performance has a predominant tendency to appeal to a prurient interest in sex to minors,”…”depicts or describes nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement or sadomasochistic abuse in a manner that is patently offensive to prevailing standards in the adult community with respect to what is suitable for minors,”…”lacks serious literary, scientific, educational, artistic, or political value for minors.”

So, a prosecution shouldn’t be based on the “offense” of one person, but on the understanding of cultural standards within the community as a whole. In this light, I think that the bill would only help support a wholesome, age appropriate curriculum by making teachers think twice about what texts they chose to use. This is something that we should be doing every day regardless of the law. In order to be an effective teacher, each time I consider a text for a lesson, I must ask myself the following questions:

Is this text relevant to what I want my students to learn?

Is this text engaging, fun, and safe for my students?

Could this text be uncomfortable or even emotionally painful for any of the students in my class? If so, am I able to consult with them prior to teaching this text or is there another text that may provide the same kind of vehicle for my lesson?

When I perform this task, I am using Ralph Tyler’s model for backward design. I am constructing my lesson based on my objectives for student learning and not the text that I want to teach.  One of the best ways that we can prevent lawsuits and even simple misunderstandings is to include parents in what we are doing. Keeping the lines of communication open between parents, students (and their peers) with what we are doing in the class room will help foster the kind of classroom community that is more likely to support student success and overall well-being of the teacher, students, and parents.

I have considered extending the on-line social media ideas that we have discussed in my methods classes for communicating with parents to providing a “pre-view” or even a “movie trailer” for texts and other media that we plan to explore in our classroom. This would be a great way for parents and students to see what we will be doing and to voice any questions or concerns in advance. Getting written permission for some things might also be a good idea, but creating the opportunity to preview a text might help parents feel more comfortable and knowledgeable about what they are agreeing to. I have also considered making it possible for parents to check books out of my classroom library as well, to read what their students are reading or simply to explain their own mental library for young adult literature. Perhaps this would be a great opportunity for allowing parents to pre-read texts that we are going to cover, offer feedback about the text, and even present ideas on teaching with the text.

What ideas can you think of when we consider teaching materials that might fall into the “no-go-zone” of our state legislation?

 

References:




4 comments:

  1. Thank you for sharing this Megan!
    I too am worried for my students and fellow teachers if this bill gets passed. Today over 150 students called local congressman and state representatives to veto the bill so it is nice to see the students getting involved in this as well. It feels like it's just one more thing to worry about, but I've realized that we are in this together (not referencing high school musical here) but yes I would agree that your reading is safe for your students. My Mother was a teacher and she said there's always some sort of legislation trying to be passed to "help" students. In the end all we can do is plan our lessons to the best of our abilities and give our students the best opportunities we can with what we have. Thanks for sharing your thoughts and feelings on this subject. I wish you nothing but success in your job search and family.
    -Austin Mann

    ReplyDelete
  2. Megan,

    I am grateful that you posted over this issue. I also find it ironic that when all of this becomes main stream public is immediately following my unit over Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, a novella that depicts the harm of censorship and the effects that it has on a society.

    When my CT and I brought this before our class, we displayed the bill and then held full class discussions over the implications of what it means to educators and students alike. Most of the students were shocked by the bill and what it could mean for my CT and myself. She and I were able to connect it to novels that we have recently taught to the class and students also made several of their own connections to the texts.

    My CT decided to offer students extra credit if they wrote a letter connecting this bill to their study of Fahrenheit 451. Several students seemed excited to take her up on this offer, and I am looking forward to reading what they have to say themselves. Hopefully enough educators stand up for our rights as teachers maybe together, we can all reach the legislature.



    Wishing you the best,

    Stephanie Deaver

    ReplyDelete
  3. Austin and Stephanie - Thank you both for your thoughtful comments!

    ReplyDelete
  4. You are wise to carefully consider these issues before teaching any literature. Keeping parents informed is key. When you inform parents, be sure to give your rationale for teaching and what you expect to accomplish by teaching that story. Well said.

    ReplyDelete